Sunday, April 10, 2016

Fair or unfair?

Daily News (West Bend, Wis.)
Published: March 23, 2016



Fair or unfair?

Area AD says private schools have bad rap

By NICHOLAS DETTMANN
Daily News

A perceived advantage for nonpublic schools in the WIAA membership is misleading, unfair and not true, according to an area athletic director.
“It’s not just private schools that have success,” Kettle Moraine Lutheran Athletic Director Len Collyard said.
On April 20, the WIAA will have its annual meeting and it recently posted its meeting agenda. On the agenda is a proposed success factor to help determine postseason tournament placement in soccer, volleyball, basketball, softball and baseball, among other amendment proposals. But the one on tournament placement will be the heart of the meeting.
It’s the backbone of a debate that’s gone on for more than a decade.
Ever since the defunct-WISAA joined the WIAA in 2000, there has been debate of whether nonpublic schools have an unfair advantage when it comes to attracting students to their schools.
The debate has picked up steam in the last several years with the dominance of Whitefish Bay Dominican’s boys basketball team, which won their fifth straight state title Saturday — a record.
Collyard believes it is unfair for a large population to criticize and make assumptions about schools only based on the success of a select few.
Collyard, an athletic director at KML for 40 years, was a member of the WISAA’s Board of Control when the decision was made for the WISAA and the WIAA to combine.
So why did it happen?
“Some people wanted to say it was economics,” Collyard said. “Financially, the WISAA was in a strong position. It wasn’t a financial issue.”
There were several factors that led to the WISAA’s folding. One of which was competitiveness.
Collyard pointed to Milwaukee Marquette and Milwaukee Pius as examples at that time.
“There were several key schools that felt like they couldn’t win because people expected them to win because they were the biggest school,” Collyard said. “They didn’t have anything to shoot for.”
When WISAA joined the WIAA, WISAA had 53 schools and the enrollment figures drastically varied from as few as 100 students to more than 1,000. In addition, in most cases, WISAA sports were a single division, which meant schools of about 100 students had to compete against much larger schools .
On the other side, Marquette and Pius, for example, competed against schools that were a third of their sizes.
Collyard said the WISAA reached a point where it couldn’t field a viable tournament where all programs believed they had a chance to compete, let alone have it not be one-sided. So the idea to join the WIAA was proposed.
In the fall of 2000, the multi-year transition was complete.
“The feeling was at that time, if we wanted to make the switch was to make it on a strength and not a weakness,” Collyard said. “Finances were not an issue.
“It wasn’t like they were on their last leg financially.”
When WISAA folded, remaining finances were split among those members.
At the time of the combination, the WIAA membership was in favor of it.
“The vote wasn’t all that close,” Collyard said, adding it was about a two-thirds majority.
Collyard acknowledged there was also debate about which program was the true state champion in a respective sport. Was it Milwaukee Vincent or Pius in basketball?
“There were certain segments (of WISAA) that had a strong feeling that the tournament options for them were limited,” Collyard said.
The debate on trying to put programs on a level playing field reached new heights in 2014 when members of the Six Rivers Conference introduced an enrollment multiplier for nonpublic schools to determine postseason divisional placement. The number was 1.65, meaning KML’s, Living Word Lutheran’s and other nonpublic WIAA member schools’ enrollment would be multiplied by 1.65 to determine which division they should compete in for a state tournament series.
Since then, an Ad Hoc committee was assembled and it came up with a success factor, which would put schools on a points system. If a school accumulated ‘X’ points in a three-year span, it’d move up a division.
At last spring’s meeting, a two-hour debate saw several amendments to a proposal for the enrollment multiplier, rather than the success factor. After a vote, status quo remained.
“The group did a lot of work,” West Bend East Athletic Director Shane Hansen said. “I know they did a lot of research and homework. It’s worth thinking about and talking about.”
Hansen said 1.65 was an arbitrary number.
“It wasn’t something I felt comfortable with,” Hansen said.
At last year’s meeting, Collyard was one of several nonpublic school members to express distaste for any kind of multiplier.
“You’re constantly labeled that you have these perceived advantages and it’s not true in all cases,” Collyard said.
He cited St. Lawrence Seminary as an example — a rural all-boys school. St. Lawrence has an enrollment of 398 in a town of 762 residents in Fond du Lac County. Already with WIAA rule, single-sex schools count double toward tournament placement.
“When you try to make everything equitable, it’s not possible,” Collyard said. “There’s all kinds of factors. How can you make it fair for everybody? You can’t. It’s not something that can be solved by one type of program.
“It’s not going to solve everybody’s problem.”
But then there are programs such as Dominican boys basketball or Catholic Memorial girls volleyball, for example, that create a perceived idea of unfair balance. That’s not right, Collyard said.
“I think it’s something that happens all across the country,” he said. “In some cases, you have some private schools that have a reputation of bringing in athletes to their school. As a result, they’re successful year after year.”
Collyard believes if Dominican was a rural school, the perception would be different. He said Dominican probably wouldn’t get as many headlines if it was a rural school. The rural vs. urban issue has also been at the heart of this controversy.
Even if it’s voted down April 20, Hansen said don’t expect the debate to stop.
“I don’t know what the best outcome is because I haven’t seen a perfect solution,” he said.

No comments:

Post a Comment

NICHOLAS DETTMANN'S ARCHIVES

Blog Archive