Wednesday, April 1, 2015

COLUMN: Six Rivers making a mess

Daily News (West Bend, Wis.)
Published: March 7, 2015



Six Rivers making a mess

Members of the Six Rivers Conference believe the road to success is too tough. The solution? Cause a ruckus within the membership and threaten disbandment from the WIAA if we don’t get our way.
Kind of sounds like a toddler, doesn’t it?
The idea of larger populations directly correlating to success in athletics is hard to swallow. There have been plenty of programs with less pickings of potential students, but have enjoyed success in athletics.
However, let’s try and take a look at things from the Six Rivers Conference’s perspective.
A story in Friday’s Daily News revealed how the conference believes there is competitive imbalance because a collection of schools don’t believe there is a fair chance of postseason advancement. The conference schools believe this because its population is a disadvantage. That part is true. Southwest Wisconsin is a rural section of the state, comparable to areas north of Wausau, while other parts of the state are far more populous.
Having more students in a region can offer good things, such as competition. However, success doesn’t always come with it.
But speaking of areas north of Wausau, let’s consider South Shore High School in Port Wing — a sixhour drive from West Bend.
The South Shore girls basketball team is one of the premier programs in the state. It has the top-two all-time leading scorers in state history — Jolene Anderson and Megan Gustafson.
In the last five years, South Shore has lost 19 games — only four in the last three seasons — and are consistent contenders to reach state; it has been for more than a decade.
South Shore’s girls team finished the regular season ranked No. 2 in the state’s Associated Press Division 5 poll.
The population of Port Wing, which is along Lake Superior? 164. South Shore’s enrollment? 52.
Look at Randolph’s boys basketball team from 2002-05. The latest enrollment number for Randolph? 176.
Success in small towns and areas is possible.
Being able to have a larger population can help maintain a program. However, the argument that population is a direct factor in success in athletics doesn’t add up.
The Six Rivers Conference wants to level the playing field. If it doesn’t get its way, there is the potential of some schools leaving the WIAA.
So, let’s get this straight: You can’t advance in a postseason tournament because larger populations have it better than you, so the best solution is to leave the organization that sponsors state tournaments, therefore excluding your school from those tournaments.
Is that really what’s best for the kids?
It’s said all the time the experience of high school athletics outweighs the success or lack of success on the playing field or court. That’s not what this behavior is teaching.
If anything, it almost comes off as we don’t believe our kids are good enough to make it to state, so we have to make things easier for them to do so.
If it’s not hard to achieve, then why bother?
Data doesn’t support nonpublic schools having it easier to get to state than public schools.
Co-ops could potentially work in this situation. Try that first before passing a bunch of enrollment multiplier figures that will segregate member schools for no reason at all. Not to mention adopting a bunch of goofy math equations in attempt to get fairness is tedious.
You want fairness? This is not the way to go.

No comments:

Post a Comment

NICHOLAS DETTMANN'S ARCHIVES

Blog Archive