Thursday, March 20, 2014

Equality changes looming

Daily News (West Bend, Wis.)
Published: March 13, 2014



Equality changes looming

Nonpublic schools could face enrollment multiplier

By NICHOLAS DETTMANN
Daily News

Equality within the WIAA may have new meaning if the organization’s membership votes in favor of a new and likely controversial proposal.
In a stunning move, the WIAA has announced a new amendment proposal that would multiply the enrollments of all nonpublic member schools by 1.65 for tournament placement purposes in all sports. It will be voted on during the WIAA’s annual meeting April 16 in Stevens Point. “After the initial surprise and second thoughts and consideration, I was comf ortable with the fact that members were engaging and exercising their rights,” WIAA’s Executive Director Dave Anderson said Wednesday.
In most cases, proposed amendment changes go through a process of being introduced to the WIAA. It is a three-step process, starting the Sports Advisory Committee, then the Advisory Council and then the Board of Control. Once through that process, the amendment is voted on at the WIAA Annual Meeting each April. That’s not how this proposal came about.
In the WIAA Constitution, a proposed amendment can be generated from the membership based on 10 percent support by member schools. There are 505 member schools in the WIAA.
Anderson said about 70 schools have signed off on the proposal, which is why it is now in the hands of the membership. And that’s why, according to some in the area, this proposal is shocking.
“It took me by surprise because I didn’t even know they were considering it,” Kettle Moraine Lutheran boys basketball coach Todd Jahns said. “To me, it’s like where did it come from?”
For KML, its enrollment, based on the multiplier, would go from 392 (the projected 2014-15 enrollment) to 646.8. Living Word Lutheran’s would go from 155 to 255.8.
Anderson said it is hard to foresee the impact of the rule, if passed, adding it all depends on each school’s particular situation.
For Living Word Lutheran Principal Dave Miskimen and Jahns, this proposal, if passed, would be devastating.
“It doesn’t work,” Miskimen said. “The research shows in other states that it doesn’t work.
“I do also believe that there’s a component to it that thinks private schools have it easy and they don’t have to work that hard. ... I’ve never understood the rationale of it.”
“I think there’s a misconception that private schools recruit,” Jahns said. “That’s just not the reality. That’s not true. ... With open enrollment, kids can transfer from public school to another public school.”
Looking at the 2013 WIAA football playoffs, of the 224 teams that qualified for the postseason, 43 would have played in a different division (20 percent), including Slinger, which is a public school.
The football playoffs are broken up into seven 32-team brackets and are placed based on enrollment.
If this rule was in place last season, Slinger would’ve competed in the Division 3 playoffs, instead of Division 2. Germantown and Kewaskum would’ve remained the same.
However, schools like Division 6 power St. Mary’s Springs would’ve played in Division 4. Milwaukee Pius, Winnebago Lutheran Academy, Manitowoc Lutheran, Lake Country Lutheran and Burlington Catholic Central would’ve gone up two divisions.
“You’re going into very delicate areas,” Jahns said. “It becomes a hard sell for getting kids motivated to play. It will create some very huge issues. If it passes, there will be some backlash.”
Miskimen said the proposal is discriminatory.
“If recruiting is a problem, multipliers aren’t the solution,” he said. “Unethical recruitment is not a private school issue.”
The 1.65 number was set because that’s the rule in Illinois.
“There are a number of other states where multipliers are in place,” Anderson said. “If they are discriminatory, I struggle to understand how they’re able to exist in other states.
“I think any time a segment of a membership (is) singled out, then certainly someone will scrutinize it.”
He added, “It’s premature to speculate.”

No comments:

Post a Comment

NICHOLAS DETTMANN'S ARCHIVES

Blog Archive